Beyond the more traditional paradigm of advice taking, which is at the center of the symposium “New advances in advice taking research: Cognitive, social, and algorithmic perspectives”, this symposium highlights paradigms and cases in which dependency among individuals is less structured. In five talks, we present and discuss evidence from paradigms featuring dependent judgments and belief updating and highlight how others influence individuals’ judgments and beliefs in various ways.

The first contribution highlights how planned missing data designs can help us measure belief updating when no initial judgment is elicited. The second contribution draws on sequential collaboration, a method for aggregating estimates that does not include initial judgments, and examines whether contributors are influenced by social information about others. The third contribution investigates how framing and repetition of information systematically influence not only subjective truth judgments but also confidence, which in turn has been associated with reduced information seeking. In the fourth contribution, belief updating to scientific hypotheses is compared under different ordering and under either sequential or simultaneous presentation of evidence. Finally, the last contribution examines how trust in science shapes individuals’ belief updating for scientific evidence considering both source expertise and ambiguity of evidence.