08:30 - 10:00
Talk Session IV
+
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-HS1-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: HS1
Chair/s:
Stephan Frederic Dahm
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-HS2-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: HS2
Chair/s:
Arndt Bröder
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-HS3-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: HS3
Chair/s:
Michael Geers
Misinformation poses a serious challenge to societies and democracies worldwide. This symposium brings together novel methodological approaches and empirical insights on the psychology of misinformation, but also critically discusses current research practices and paradigms. Talk 1 (Lena Nadarevic, University of Mannheim) introduces an experiment testing the effectiveness of warnings against the truth effect in a simulated social media environment. Talk 2 (Mubashir Sultan, Max Planck Institute for Human Development) presents a meta-analysis on news veracity judgments of misinformation. It will aggregate previous findings, highlighting pertinent trends for the predictors of misinformation susceptibility, including demographics (e.g., age, political identity), analytical thinking, partisan bias, and the illusory truth effect. Talk 3 (Michael Geers, Max Planck Institute for Human Development) introduces a task analysis that identifies the processes required for users to share true content online. It also highlights some cognitive and motivational challenges for sharing true content, maps interventions, and identifies open research questions. Finally, a panel discussion critically discusses the current state of misinformation research, including reflections on the ecological validity of experimental paradigms and the extent to which some work on misinformation has come short of building on previous psychological research. Next to the speakers of talks 1-3, the discussion features Pia Lamberty, co-director of the Center for Monitoring, Analysis and Strategy (CeMAS). She studies how people at the center of society are radicalized by conspiracy theories and reject democracy altogether, and her real-world experience may offer a new perspective that many experimental psychologists do not have.
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-A6-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: A6
Chair/s:
Marius Peelen
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-A7-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: A7
Chair/s:
Belkis Ezgi Arikan, Dimitris Voudouris
Touch is one of the most critical senses, as it provides information about the state of our own body and of the external world. For instance, tactile input from different surfaces influences how humans interact with these surfaces. Meanwhile, tactile sampling and processing is also influenced by our movements. In the real world, touch can be directed to different textures, surfaces and objects, with different goals in mind (from contacting a texture to exploring a surface to changing an object’s position). The proposed symposium will discuss recent findings on the interplay between touch and movement in naturalistic settings. More specifically, we will address how tactile processing is
modulated by various tactile inputs, during motion, and under different tasks. Dione Mariama will talk about how humans explore natural textures and how mechanoreceptive afferents transform physical inputs into the perception of touch. Luigi Tamè will present evidence that distortions in the perceived distances between tactile stimuli on the hand can also be observed in early somatosensory and motor areas. Focusing on natural object manipulation, Benoit Delhaye will then address how tactile interactions between fingertips and objects provide grasp stability. Alessandro Moscatelli will talk about everyday interactions between hand movements and touch, and how optimal integration
models can predict tactile illusions of motion. Finally, Ezgi Arikan will discuss the role of approach-avoidance goals on tactile sensitivity when moving towards and away from objects in a virtual reality environment.
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-A8-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: A8
Chair/s:
Shaheed Azaad
Contemporary action understanding research has shown that cues guide our interpretation and prediction of others’ actions. This group of talks seeks to show the range kinds of cues that shape our action understanding, and the mechanisms by which they do so.

Mechanisms underlying forward simulation in action understanding
Dr Francesco Iani – Universita Di Torino
During action observation, people represent the observed action unfolding in time and this representation speeds up the recognition of the next action states compared to the backward states. In this talk we will discuss the nature of this mental stimulation as well as the possible mechanisms underlying action anticipation. We hypothesize that there are at least two processes: (1) an action prediction mechanism, by which people simulate the next states of the observed action through a representation of the action unfolding in time; (2) a goal prediction mechanism, by which people infer the final goal of the observed action based on the physical properties of the object.

Cues to other's higher-order mental states inform action predictions
Dr Katrina McDonough – University of Aberdeen
How we perceive and interpret the actions of others depends not only on action observations, but also action predictions. Here we show that cues to other's higher-order mental states inform predictions of their upcoming behaviour and guide action perception.

Communication through teaching: How expert pianists and novice students interact
through sound

Atsuko Tominaga – Central European University
In my talk, I will discuss how expert pianists produce and adapt teaching signals through their performances and how novice students detect such cues by listening to teachers’ performances.

Others’ social contexts guide our predictions of their actions
Dr Shaheed Azaad – Postdoctoral Researcher, Central European University
Recent work on action prediction has shown that contextual, non-kinematic, cues can inform our predictions of others’ actions. In this series of experiments, we show that others’ social contexts similarly guide action prediction.
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-B16-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: B16
Chair/s:
Jan Tünnermann, Adriana L Ruiz-Rizzo, Ingrid Scharlau
Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) has been around for approximately half a century. Its basic idea is that visual perception is biased competition of visual categorizations that race visual short-term memory. The biases stem from attentional and perceptual influences. TVA links observable data to theoretical concepts with mathematical rigor and helps to explain phenomena with quantitatively precise concepts. Progress in TVA might not be fast, but it is continuous and robust. This symposium covers recent developments in topics of basic and applied research. In the first session, Scharlau & Tünnermann survey recent advances with new stimuli and recording
settings. Connecting to this, Biermeier & Scharlau investigate attention capacity in mixed-reality settings. Poth & Schneider disentangle the speed of location and object processing. Tünnermann et al. show how simulations of visual foraging depend on dynamically adjusting spatial attention, and Blurton et al. discuss improvements in modeling cognitive control. The second session focuses on recent applications of TVA in clinical contexts: Ruiz-Rizzo et al. present the relationship between visual processing speed and cognitive complaints in older adults. Kattlun et al. investigate the role of visual-short-term memory in cognitive deficits of patients who survived severe sepsis. Martin et
al. demonstrate how fatigue relates to visual processing speed and pupillary unrest in post-COVID patients. Srowig et al. close by showing how visual short-term memory is associated with neuropsychological performance in patients at a high-risk for dementia.
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-B17-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: B17
Chair/s:
Magnus Liebherr
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-B21-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: B21
Chair/s:
André Knops
The mental number line (MNL) as a metaphor for describing the spatially organized mental representation of numbers in long-term memory has a number of theoretical implications that refer to spatial-numerical associations (e.g. the Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes [SNARC]), biases of spatial attention (attentional SNARC), or the involvement of transient stimulus representations in working memory. The current symposium brings together empirical works from leading European labs that put these notions to test. The talks are complementary in terms of methodology (e.g. reaction time experiments; line marking tasks; word categorization tasks; temporal
order judgments tasks), investigated samples (healthy participants; neurological patients) and age range (Kindergarteners, adults) but jointly address the idea of a spatial representation of numbers from different perspectives. The common underlying theoretical framework will facilitate the exchange on limiting conditions of the MNL metaphor by transgressing disciplinary boundaries. This will help developing alternative theoretical frameworks by highlighting alternative mechanisms such as transient organizational principles in working memory, task-specific spatial response codes, or culturally mediated factors such as counting habits.
08:30 - 10:00
Tue-B22-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: B22
Chair/s:
Kerstin Jost
10:00 - 10:30
Coffee Break
Building A / B; Audimax
10:30 - 12:00
Tue-Audimax-Keynote II
Tue-Keynote II
Room: Audimax
Title: Active inference and sentient behaviour

How can we understand ourselves as sentient creatures? And what are the principles that underwrite sentient behaviour? This presentation uses the free energy principle to furnish an account in terms of active inference. First, we will try to understand sentience from the point of view of physics; in particular, the properties that self-organising systems—that distinguish themselves from their lived world—must possess. We then rehearse the same story from the point of view of a neurobiologist, trying to understand functional brain architectures. The narrative starts with a heuristic proof (and simulations of a primordial soup) suggesting that life—or biological self-organization—is an inevitable and emergent property of any dynamical system that possesses a Markov blanket. This conclusion is based on the following arguments: if a system can be differentiated from its external milieu, then its internal and external states must be conditionally independent. These independencies induce a Markov blanket that separates internal and external states. Crucially, this equips internal states with an information geometry, pertaining to probabilistic beliefs about something; namely external states. This free energy is the same quantity that is optimized in Bayesian inference and machine learning (where it is known as an evidence lower bound). In short, internal states will appear to infer—and act on—their world to preserve their integrity. This leads to a Bayesian mechanics, which can be neatly summarised as self-evidencing. In the second half of the talk, we will unpack these ideas using simulations of Bayesian belief updating in the brain and relate them to predictive processing and sentient behaviour.
g. In the second half of the talk, we will unpack these ideas using simulations of Bayesian belief updating in the brain and relate them to predictive processing and sentient behaviour.
 
12:00 - 13:30
A9/10
Lunch session with information about the institute’s products and services
The Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) is the supra-regional research support facility for psychology in German-speaking countries. It supports the entire scientific work process, from literature research and study planning to data collection and analyses to documentation, archiving, and publication of results. We invite participants of the TeaP 2023 to join us for lunch, and healthy lunchboxes will be provided. Feel free to come meet the ZPID Staff and learn more about our ideas on open science. Take this opportunity to check out ZPID’s free-of-charge services. Brown bag lunches will be provided on a first come, first serve basis.
13:30 - 15:00
Talk Session V
+
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-HS1-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: HS1
Chair/s:
Dirk U Wulff
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-HS2-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: HS2
Chair/s:
Veit Kubik, Bernhard Pastötter
Although typically used for assessment, tests are considered as one of the most effective learning techniques. Practice tests can be provided after the to-be-learned information (i.e., posttests) or beforehand (i.e., pretests). Both types of practice tests have been shown to enhance prior learning. In addition to this backward effect, posttests also enhance subsequent learning of newly presented information (i.e., the forward effect of testing). This symposium aims to present recent findings from various labs on the benefits of practice tests and to examine its underlying mechanisms. Kliegl et al. examined the benefit of pretests and how its magnitude is moderated by retention interval and the presence of interfering information. Shanks et al. examined the grain size hypothesis of posttests proposing that several tests of smaller amounts of information enhance long-term retention more than a single test on all information. Bencze et al. investigated event-related potential (ERP) correlates of repeated retrieval (vs. restudy) practice to specify the contribution of episodic recollection and post-retrieval evaluation processes to long-term recall success. Rummer et al. examined students’ metacognitive accuracy for long-retention benefits of posttests compared to rereading and notetaking; they specifically used offline judgements of learning that are made independent of the current learning situation. Kubik et al. examined the forward effect of testing in visual-spatial learning and how the amount of proactive interference moderates its size. Finally, Pastötter et al. examined whether the forward effect of testing is immune to stress induced after encoding. Together, this symposium will provide insights on the underlying mechanisms of practice tests and its practical implications in educational settings.
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-HS3-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: HS3
Chair/s:
Nikoletta Symeonidou, Hilal Tanyas
Source memory is a cognitive process involved in remembering contextual features of information. This symposium will bring together five researchers who will present recent evidence obtained from various substantive research questions about source memory. First, Tanyas et al. give a talk entitled “Testing the Serial Processing Model of Item and Source Retrieval: Applying the Additive Factor Method to Source Monitoring” and ask whether retrieval processes for an item (e.g., what was said?) and its source (e.g., who said it?) operate serially or in parallel. Focusing on more applied source memory research, Ülker and Bodemer examine external source memory (also with the “who said what” paradigm) and knowledge acquisition in a pseudo-collaborative setting with their talk “Source Memory and Collaborative Learning: The Role of Group Composition and Conflicting Information”. Following this, Symeonidou and Kuhlmann give a presentation namely “Enhanced Source Memory for Emotional Sources: What Is the Role of Encoding Instructions?” where they investigate how encoding instructions influence source-emotionality effects on source memory by using multinomial modeling. The next talk is “Exploring Source Memory to Understand the Mechanisms of JOL Reactivity.” by Loaiza et al. By using a novel implementation of a hierarchical Bayesian model of multidimensional source memory, they query in their registered report, how the act of assessing one’s learning influences later memory. Finally, Niedziałkowska and Nieznański present their work entitled “How Does Cognitive Load Influence Recollection of True/False Information?” and report findings revealing that cognitive load impairs recollection of false information compared to true information.
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-A6-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: A6
Chair/s:
Paula Soballa
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-A7-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: A7
Chair/s:
Andreas B. Eder, Carina G. Giesen
In the Poster Prize Award Session, the finalists present their posters to the jury. The Section General Psychology of the German Psychological Society (DGPs) will grant three Poster Awards for the best posters presented at the 65th TeaP. The best three posters receive a cash prize: 1st prize (300 €), 2nd prize (200 €), 3rd prize (100 €). The ranking will be decided by the Poster Prize Committee of the 65th TeaP. The committee will evaluate the quality of the posters using the following criteria:
  • Scientific Quality
  •  Originality
  • Clarity
  • Self-explanatory
  • Poster Design
The winners will be publicly announced before the final keynote on the third conference day.
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-A8-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: A8
Chair/s:
Julia Englert
How we view and evaluate ourselves is thought to play a crucial role in our well-being and in the development and maintenance of psychopathology. Drawing upon information from memory and our current environment, judgment is relative to comparison standards. Therefore, self-construction is subject to contextual and situational influences. Social comparison is the most salient and most-widely researched standard informing self-construal. Yet, the complex effects of social comparison are still not well understood. The research presented in this symposium aims to systematically investigate the comparison process and its components, as well as its affective, cognitive and
behavioural consequences. Our contributors draw on a wide array of experimental paradigms, including false feedback manipulation, trauma film exposure, comparison orientation interventions, comparison sample manipulation, and a novel paradigm displaying the (mis)fortunes of others. They report effects of social comparisons on a variety of outcomes, including on self-and other-judgments, positive and negative affect, envy and schadenfreude, prosocial behaviour, cognitive orientation, goal-directed action and psychological distress. Together, our research on comparison processes addresses questions from the areas of social psychology, sports psychology, neuroscience
and psychopathology, for which we will consider translational implications.
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-B16-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: B16
Chair/s:
Jan Tünnermann, Adriana L Ruiz-Rizzo, Ingrid Scharlau
Bundesen’s Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) has been around for approximately half a century. Its basic idea is that visual perception is biased competition of visual categorizations that race visual short-term memory. The biases stem from attentional and perceptual influences. TVA links observable data to theoretical concepts with mathematical rigor and helps to explain phenomena with quantitatively precise concepts. Progress in TVA might not be fast, but it is continuous and robust. This symposium covers recent developments in topics of basic and applied research. In the first session, Scharlau & Tünnermann survey recent advances with new stimuli and recording
settings. Connecting to this, Biermeier & Scharlau investigate attention capacity in mixed-reality settings. Poth & Schneider disentangle the speed of location and object processing. Tünnermann et al. show how simulations of visual foraging depend on dynamically adjusting spatial attention, and Blurton et al. discuss improvements in modeling cognitive control. The second session focuses on recent applications of TVA in clinical contexts: Ruiz-Rizzo et al. present the relationship between visual processing speed and cognitive complaints in older adults. Kattlun et al. investigate the role of visual-short-term memory in cognitive deficits of patients who survived severe sepsis. Martin et
al. demonstrate how fatigue relates to visual processing speed and pupillary unrest in post-COVID patients. Srowig et al. close by showing how visual short-term memory is associated with neuropsychological performance in patients at a high-risk for dementia.
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-B17-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: B17
Chair/s:
Jan Pohl
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-B21-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: B21
Chair/s:
Alexandra Lorson
13:30 - 15:00
Tue-B22-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: B22
Chair/s:
Andrea M. Philipp
15:00 - 16:30
Poster Session II including Snack Break
+
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-Building A / B-Poster II
Tue-Poster II
Room: Building A / B
The demonstrations feature live presentations of research tools. They begin with the poster sessions and take about 30 to 45 minutes. For some demonstrations, you will need to bring a laptop if you want to actively try out the tools. All demonstrations are repeated each day of the conference.
 

Demo PreReg: Preregistration in Psychology (Room B21)

Instructor: Lisa Spitzer, Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Website: https://prereg-psych.org/

Preregistering studies is an effective open science technique because it documents which (analytical) decisions were made prior to knowing the data. However, preregistration involves additional effort. ZPID, the Leibniz Institute for Psychology, fosters open science practices in psychology and related disciplines by providing researchers with tools and services at each stage of the scientific process. The Pre-Registration in Psychology platform (https://prereg-psych.org) provides information on preregistration, templates for creating your own preregistration, and the possibility to easily submit and publish to a repository. The platform is introduced in this demonstration.

Requirements: Bring a laptop, if you want to click along but just watching is fine.

 

Demo DataWiz: Research Data Documentation in Psychology Made Easy (Room B22)

Instructor: Katarina Blask, Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Website: https://datawiz2.dev.zpid.de/

In recent years, it became obvious that Open Science practices, like sharing research data in a (re)usable way means additional effort.  In particular, the quality-assured and sustainable provision of research data requires at least a minimum of data documentation. For optimal (re)use, typically three levels of data documentation or metadata are needed: (1) The basic resource description for collection management and resource discovery (Dublin Core); (2) the study-level documentation for research context and methods; and (3) the data-level documentation (codebooks or data dictionaries). 

In order to facilitate the laborious task of data documentation in psychology, a web-based tool - named DataWiz - was developed. The primary goal of the development project funded by the German Research Foundation was to lower the hurdle to do data documentation and to make it an integral part of common research practices in psychology. This demo aims to introduce the documentation module of DataWiz, which allows researchers to create a research data object containing the data and metadata in a non-proprietary format that can be uploaded to research data repositories.

Requirements: Bring a laptop, if you want to click along but just watching is fine.
 

Demo emoTouch Web: A Web-Based System for Continuous Response Studies and Audience Feedback in Live-, Lab- and Online Settings (Room A8)

Instructors: Christoph Louven, Carolin Scholle, Fabian Gehrs, Osnabrück University, Germany

Website: https://www.emoTouch.de

emoTouch Web is a new web-based system for designing, conducting, and evaluating continuous response real-time studies. It is based on web and network technologies and turns any modern smartphone, tablet, laptop and desktop computer into a flexible and reliable research and audience feedback tool in laboratory, online, and live settings. 

The interface of emoTouch studies is completely configurable and may contain an unlimited number of interface elements like one-dimensional sliders, 2D rating areas, category scales, checkboxes, buttons, images and text elements. Any audio or video files can also be integrated and will play from the participant's devices. The interface will dynamically adapt to the various screen sizes and ratios.  

Once a study is designed and started, it can be accessed just by scanning the study's QR Code. Subjects can even participate with the smartphones they carry in their pockets anyway ('Bring-Your-Own-Device', BYOD). This easily enables e.g. audience studies and feedback situations with hundreds of participants at the same time.

For the evaluation of the collected real-time data, emoTouch also contains coordinated tools for the graphical and numerical display and analysis of the data in longitudinal and cross-section.

emoTouch Web can be useful in all disciplines that deal with time-bound phenomena, such as music, theatre, dance, film, commercials, lectures, speeches or sport events. The system was developed at the musicology department of Osnabrück University (Germany) and is available free of charge for scientific purposes at https://www.emotouch.de.

The demonstration shows the possibilities of the system as well as the flow of a typical research process with emoTouch Web.

Requirements: For an active participation in a demo study, you will need a reliable wifi connection, a smartphone, tablet, or laptop. To actively try the system's researcher interface, you will need a laptop.
 

Demo PsychNotebook: Create, share, and export your code projects / teach coding (Room A6)

Instructor: Lars Braun, Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Website: https://www.psychnotebook.org/

PsychNotebook is a platform that offers statistical software such as RStudio and JupyterLab in an online environment. It is a tool to promote open science, in particular transparent and reproducible analyses, with a focus on teaching and collaboration.  

PsychNotebook supports teaching (and learning) code-based analyses by removing the hassle of installing or setting up software. In PsychNotebook you can create projects that contain scripts, data, instructions and more. You can share your projects with your students (copy access) or your collaborators (edit access) so that recipients work with exactly the same files in exactly the same software environment. Problems caused by working on different versions or in different directories are thus eliminated. Likewise projects can be easily archived and then imported again, resulting in the same scripts running in the same software environment as before. In this demonstration, I will introduce the features of PsychNotebook described above.

Requirements: None, maybe laptop, if you want to click along.
 

Demo PsychArchives: The disciplinary Repository for Psychological Science (Room A7)

Instructors: Yi-Hsiu Chen & Lea Gerhards, Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)

Website: https://psycharchives.org/

This demo will introduce PsychArchives, the disciplinary repository for psychological science. Recent years have seen the gradual but sustained growth in practices collectively known as ‘Open Science’. Part of this ongoing cultural change, which is well underway in Psychology, has been a growing advocacy for transparency and access to research output from across the entire research cycle. PsychArchives, which is maintained by the Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), provides the necessary sustainable infrastructure to achieve these goals. In PsychArchives, a variety of digital research objects, including articles, preprints, research data, code, supplements, preregistrations and tests, are safely stored and made accessible for the long term.

Requirements: None.

15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P2-Poster II-1
Tue-Poster II-1
Room: P2
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P2-Poster II-2
Tue-Poster II-2
Room: P2
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P3-Poster II-1
Tue-Poster II-1
Room: P3
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P3-Poster II-2
Tue-Poster II-2
Room: P3
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P3-Poster II-3
Tue-Poster II-3
Room: P3
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P3-Poster II-4
Tue-Poster II-4
Room: P3
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P12-Poster II-1
Tue-Poster II-1
Room: P12
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P12-Poster II-2
Tue-Poster II-2
Room: P12
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P12-Poster II-3
Tue-Poster II-3
Room: P12
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P13-Poster II-1
Tue-Poster II-1
Room: P13
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P13-Poster II-2
Tue-Poster II-2
Room: P13
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P14-Poster II-1
Tue-Poster II-1
Room: P14
15:00 - 16:30
Tue-P14-Poster II-2
Tue-Poster II-2
Room: P14
16:30 - 18:15
Tue-Audimax-Podium II
Tue-Podium II
Room: Audimax
Chair/s:
Carina G. Giesen, Christina U. Pfeuffer
Podiumsdiskussion: Wie vereinbaren Forscher*innen in der Allgemeinen Psychologie die wissenschaftliche Laufbahn mit dem Familienleben? (in deutscher Sprache)
Carina G. Giesen & Christina Pfeuffer (Jungmitgliedersprecherinnen der Fachgruppe Allgemeine Psychologie)
Bei der Frage, ob man eine Karriere in der Wissenschaft und eine Professur anstreben möchte, zögern Nachwuchswissenschaftler*innen mit kleinen Kindern oder Kinderwunsch häufig. Denn neben vielen anderen Gründen für die Entscheidung gegen eine wissenschaftliche Karriere wird oft die Vereinbarkeit des Familienlebens mit einer
wissenschaftlichen Karriere als besondere Hürde wahrgenommen. Dies führt dazu, dass auch viele begabte Nachwuchswissenschaftler*innen mit guten Aussichten und Interesse
an einer Laufbahn in der Wissenschaft sich gegen eine wissenschaftliche Laufbahn entscheiden. Wir möchten uns daher diesem Thema widmen und Bedenken zur
Vereinbarkeit von Familie und wissenschaftlicher Laufbahn aufgreifen. Wie kann ich eine Karriere in der Wissenschaft mit meinem Familienleben/ Kinderwunsch vereinbaren? Wie ist es möglich, mich um meine Laufbahn zu kümmern, wenn ich Kinder habe? In der Paneldiskussion werden individuelle Wege, Herausforderungen und Strategien zur
Vereinbarkeit von wissenschaftlicher Laufbahn und Familienleben aufgezeigt. Hierfür berichten Prof. Dr. Anne Gast (Universität Köln, Mutter von zwei Kindern), Jun.-Prof. Dr. Sarah Lukas (PH Weingarten, Mutter von drei Kindern) und Jun.-Prof Dr. David Dignath (Universität Tübingen, Vater von zwei Kindern) von ihren Erfahrungen zur Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Wissenschaft auf unterschiedlichen Karrierestufen und freuen sich auf den Austausch mit interessierten Nachwuchswissenschaftler*innen.

Panelisten: Anne Gast, David Dignath, Sarah Lukas
19:00 - 24:00
Viehmarktthermen
We will celebrate with you at the conference dinner (Gesellschaftsabend) in the Viehmarktthermen. If you have ordered a ticket at the online registration, your Conference Badge shows two wineglasses on the back. This is your admission ticket. Please show it at the entrance and look forward to a great evening amidst Roman ruins - with jazz and two Romans telling about the exciting history of the city of Trier.
If you have ordered a ticket for the Conference Dinner (March 28, 19:00-24:00), your Conference Badge shows two wineglasses on the back. This is your admission ticket. Please show it at the entrance.

 

TeaP 2023 is supported by: