15:00 - 16:30
Wed-A6-Talk VII-
Wed-Talk VII-
Room: A6
Chair/s:
Anita Körner
The term sound symbolism refers to the phenomenon that word form (e.g., the phonemes of which a word consists) and word meaning are non-arbitrarily related. For example, specific vowels have been shown to be associated with size, so that participants typically choose the word MIL (vs. MAL) to denote a small (vs. large) object (e.g., Sapir, 1929). Sound-symbolism has been shown across many of the world’s major spoken languages as well as many sign languages. The present symposium will comprise talks that span several research areas in sound symbolism, comparing different semantic dimensions, different languages, and different psychological processes. First, cross-linguistic similarities in the association between phonemes and valence (Talk 1, Körner) as well as cross-linguistic differences in sound symbolic associations for size (Talk 2, Ćwiek) will be discussed. Additionally, the contribution of articulatory compared to acoustic properties of phonemes are examined by showing that valence sound symbolism partially relies on articulation (Talk 1, Körner), while frequently, both articulatory and acoustic features interact (Talk 3, Winter). Lastly, different methods for examining sound symbolism in the lab are discussed with an emphasis on unrestricted tasks, such as asking participants to generate pseudo-words to prevent (Talk 4, Rummer). Together with the talks, the integrative discussion will facilitate a deeper understanding of how word form and meaning are related and which psychological processes drive sound symbolism. Ultimately, words reflect psychological functions and research on sound symbolism can reveal how the human mind uses ecological and psychological associations to represent meaning.
Acoustics versus articulation: What is sound symbolism based on?
Wed-A6-Talk VII-03
Presented by: Bodo Winter
Bodo Winter
University of Birmingham
Sound symbolism refers to the association of phonemes with non-speech phenomena, such as when /i/ is small (Sapir, 1929), or when “bouba” sounds rounder than “kiki” (Ćwiek et al., 2022). These associations have been shown to matter in language acquisition and processing (Kita & Imai, 2014; Lockwood & Dingemanse, 2015). A so-far inconclusive debate surrounds the psychological mechanism that underpins sound symbolism, specifically whether articulation or acoustics lie at the root of such mappings (e.g., Eberhardt, 1940; Johansson & Zlatev, 2013; Newman, 1933; Sapir, 1929). Recent proposals emphasize articulatory mechanisms (Thompson & Do, 2019; Vainio et al., 2019). In this talk, I will argue that the search for a monolithic locus of sound symbolism is futile, not only because acoustics and articulation are tightly coupled and hard to orthogonalize experimentally, but also because we already know from the existing experimental literature that different sound symbolic phenomena are supported by different mechanisms. Moreover, the same sound symbolic can actually be supported by multiple different mechanisms. I conclude with a call to move beyond the articulation versus acoustics debate in discussing sound symbolic mechanisms. Instead, emphasis should shift to considering networks of phonetic cues, both articulatory and acoustic in nature.
Keywords: sound symbolism; acoustics; articulation; speech processing