15:00 - 16:30
Wed-A6-Talk VII-
Wed-Talk VII-
Room: A6
Chair/s:
Anita Körner
The term sound symbolism refers to the phenomenon that word form (e.g., the phonemes of which a word consists) and word meaning are non-arbitrarily related. For example, specific vowels have been shown to be associated with size, so that participants typically choose the word MIL (vs. MAL) to denote a small (vs. large) object (e.g., Sapir, 1929). Sound-symbolism has been shown across many of the world’s major spoken languages as well as many sign languages. The present symposium will comprise talks that span several research areas in sound symbolism, comparing different semantic dimensions, different languages, and different psychological processes. First, cross-linguistic similarities in the association between phonemes and valence (Talk 1, Körner) as well as cross-linguistic differences in sound symbolic associations for size (Talk 2, Ćwiek) will be discussed. Additionally, the contribution of articulatory compared to acoustic properties of phonemes are examined by showing that valence sound symbolism partially relies on articulation (Talk 1, Körner), while frequently, both articulatory and acoustic features interact (Talk 3, Winter). Lastly, different methods for examining sound symbolism in the lab are discussed with an emphasis on unrestricted tasks, such as asking participants to generate pseudo-words to prevent (Talk 4, Rummer). Together with the talks, the integrative discussion will facilitate a deeper understanding of how word form and meaning are related and which psychological processes drive sound symbolism. Ultimately, words reflect psychological functions and research on sound symbolism can reveal how the human mind uses ecological and psychological associations to represent meaning.
Through the lens of a language: Is there a sound-symbolic functional load?
Wed-A6-Talk VII-02
Presented by: Aleksandra Cwiek
Aleksandra Cwiek
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
The study of Pokémon names in sound symbolism is an effective way to look at the relationship between certain sounds and their corresponding characteristics. Pokémon usually have different names across languages, but their traits – e.g., height, weight, power, etc. – remain the same. In this talk, I will present the first-to-date study on German Pokémon names, which I will relate to analyses of languages such as Japanese, English, or Mandarin Chinese (Kawahara et al., 2018; Shih et al. 2018; 2019). Even though those previous analyses often signaled similarities in sound-symbolic expression across various languages, the current comparison exposes a number of differences, which I will demonstrate in detail during the presentation. To explain those differences, I re-interpret the functional load hypothesis in a novel way – for the purpose of sound-symbolic expression. In phonology, the functional load is ascribed to features in a given language that distinguish meaning. A feature with a high functional load is more essential to distinguishing meaning than a feature with a low functional load, e.g., in English, the vowel contrast has a high functional load, but the tone has a low functional load. I propose that, in sound-symbolic research, the starting point should be the features of a given language. Looking from the perspective of individual languages, it is possible to find overarching iconic correspondences. These are, however, expressed differently depending on the language but rely on similar acoustic and articulatory characteristics.
Keywords: sound symbolism, iconicity, cross-linguistic, Pokémon, functional load