08:30 - 10:00
Wed-B22-Talk VI-
Wed-Talk VI-
Room: B22
Chair/s:
Miriam Gade
In the present symposium, we plan to bring together different perspectives of how language influences goal-directed performance in mostly language unrelated tasks. Language influences are present either because of instructions, automatic reliance on or because of individual preferences. The contributors to this symposium will present work investigating language(s) as an instructional tool, language as help for or hindrance of cognitive flexibility, language(s) as performance-regulating tool in single subject and co-agents’ settings and address measurement of inner speech and its impact on basic cognitive performance. Given the recently revoked interest in the connection
between language, cognition and performance, this symposium aims at bringing together different research endeavours and stipulate discussions and cooperations among involved researchers.
On the Automaticity of Language and Instruction
Wed-B22-Talk VI-02
Presented by: Sarah Lukas
Sarah Lukas 1, Christina Pfeuffer 2
1 Pädagogische Hochschule Weingarten, 2 Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
There is an ongoing debate on how the meaning of words is retrieved in a newly-learned language L2. Two processes are assumed: L2 words retrieve underlying concepts via associations with the corresponding words in the first language, L1, (word association hypothesis) or L2 words gain direct access to underlying concepts (concept mediation hypothesis). It is commonly shown that a higher language proficiency is needed to access word meanings directy via concepts. However, evidence for newly-learned words and the initial learning of novices are scarce. Using an item-specific priming paradigm, we demonstrate that classes and actions (e.g., “small, right!”) merely instructed during an item’s prime lead to repetition priming effects (i. e., reduced reaction times for item-specific class/action mapping repetitions) in the item’s subsequent probe (lag 2-7 trials). Crucially, this was the case to a comparable degree both when participants were instructed in L1 and when they were instructed in an L2 which they had no knowledge of prior to a brief practice phase at the beginning of the experiment. These findings indicate that the direct route to concepts can be accessed already in the very beginning of language learning and highlight how fast newly-learned words become able to automatize behavior.
Keywords: second language learning, instruction, item-specific priming, automaticity