13:30 - 15:00
Tue-HS3-Talk V-
Tue-Talk V-
Room: HS3
Chair/s:
Nikoletta Symeonidou, Hilal Tanyas
Source memory is a cognitive process involved in remembering contextual features of information. This symposium will bring together five researchers who will present recent evidence obtained from various substantive research questions about source memory. First, Tanyas et al. give a talk entitled “Testing the Serial Processing Model of Item and Source Retrieval: Applying the Additive Factor Method to Source Monitoring” and ask whether retrieval processes for an item (e.g., what was said?) and its source (e.g., who said it?) operate serially or in parallel. Focusing on more applied source memory research, Ülker and Bodemer examine external source memory (also with the “who said what” paradigm) and knowledge acquisition in a pseudo-collaborative setting with their talk “Source Memory and Collaborative Learning: The Role of Group Composition and Conflicting Information”. Following this, Symeonidou and Kuhlmann give a presentation namely “Enhanced Source Memory for Emotional Sources: What Is the Role of Encoding Instructions?” where they investigate how encoding instructions influence source-emotionality effects on source memory by using multinomial modeling. The next talk is “Exploring Source Memory to Understand the Mechanisms of JOL Reactivity.” by Loaiza et al. By using a novel implementation of a hierarchical Bayesian model of multidimensional source memory, they query in their registered report, how the act of assessing one’s learning influences later memory. Finally, Niedziałkowska and Nieznański present their work entitled “How Does Cognitive Load Influence Recollection of True/False Information?” and report findings revealing that cognitive load impairs recollection of false information compared to true information.
How Does Cognitive Load Influence Recollection of True/False Information?
Tue-HS3-Talk V-05
Presented by: Daria Niedziałkowska
Daria Niedziałkowska, Marek Nieznański
Institute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland
Dual-recollection theory (Brainerd et al., 2015) has been recently successfully applied in the research on memory for truth and falsity (Niedziałkowska & Nieznański, 2021) showing better context recollection for truth than falsity. The theory recognizes two types of recollection (context and target) and a univariate process - familiarity. In the literature on the memory representation for truth and falsity, cognitive load manipulation has been applied to test competing models since they predict different effects of load on memory for true vs. false feedback. Consequently, we investigated how cognitive load affects the processes distinguished in the dual-recollection theory operating during the memory for truth and falsity task. Concurrent tasks used to introduce load aimed to impair one of the mechanisms of the maintenance of verbal information:(a) rehearsal, by asking participants to repeat syllables after each learned sentence or (b) refreshing, where choice-reaction task was implemented. Rehearsal and refreshing impairments are assumed to differ in their impact on recollection and familiarity processes (Abadie & Camos, 2019). The results showed better context recollection for truth comparing to falsity in the control and rehearsal-interference group. Moreover, context recollection for truth was better for control group, compared to both groups with cognitive load applied. In the no-load condition target recollection for truth was better than for falsity, and in the refreshing-interference condition target recollection for falsity was better compared to control group. Our results showed that cognitive load affects memory for truth/falsity mainly by reducing the contribution of context recollection to memory of truth feedback.
Keywords: Distraction, Recollection, Familiarity, Falsity, Dual-Recollection Theory, Multinomial Modelling, Truth Bias