08:30 - 10:00
Tue-B21-Talk IV-
Tue-Talk IV-
Room: B21
Chair/s:
André Knops
The mental number line (MNL) as a metaphor for describing the spatially organized mental representation of numbers in long-term memory has a number of theoretical implications that refer to spatial-numerical associations (e.g. the Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes [SNARC]), biases of spatial attention (attentional SNARC), or the involvement of transient stimulus representations in working memory. The current symposium brings together empirical works from leading European labs that put these notions to test. The talks are complementary in terms of methodology (e.g. reaction time experiments; line marking tasks; word categorization tasks; temporal
order judgments tasks), investigated samples (healthy participants; neurological patients) and age range (Kindergarteners, adults) but jointly address the idea of a spatial representation of numbers from different perspectives. The common underlying theoretical framework will facilitate the exchange on limiting conditions of the MNL metaphor by transgressing disciplinary boundaries. This will help developing alternative theoretical frameworks by highlighting alternative mechanisms such as transient organizational principles in working memory, task-specific spatial response codes, or culturally mediated factors such as counting habits.
The role of response codes in the spatial semantics of numbers (and time).
Tue-B21-Talk IV-04
Presented by: Fabrizio Doricchi
Fabrizio Doricchi 1, 2, Mario Pinto 1, 2, Gabriele Scozia 1, 2, Stefano Lasaponara 1, 2
1 Dipartimento di Psicologia Universita’ di Roma “La Sapienza”, Roma, 2 Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Roma
Does the semantic representation of number and time magnitudes has an inherent spatial component? Through the discussion of a series of behavioural and EEG studies in healthy participants we shall argue that reliable mental-spatial representation of numbers and temporal magnitudes largely depends on the combined use of spatial and number magnitude or time magnitude codes in the task at hand. This evidence suggests that, in the domain of magnitude estimation, Space-Number, e.g. SNARC effect, or Space-Time interactions, e.g. STEARC effect, are secondary to the primary transfer of spatial response codes to the representation of number or time stimuli and do not derive from a primary congruence, or incongruence, between independent spatial representations of response space and number or time space.
Keywords: Space Number Association, Response Codes, Mental Number Line, Space Time Association