The role of facial muscle activity in explicit and implicit processing conditions: Sensorimotor simulation, emotional reaction or (evaluative) inference of content?
Mon-A8-Talk III-05
Presented by: Michaela Rohr
Facial muscle responses to emotional facial expressions are seen as indices for the involvement of affect-related, physiological processes. Typically, people react with responses congruent to the visual percept, interpreted as “facial mimicry”, or sensorimotor simulation. However, sometimes emotional reactions not congruent to the visually perceived emotion are observed. Moreover, such responses are not observed under all processing conditions, so that it is still unclear when they are triggered, what they reflect and which function they serve.
In the present study, we investigated the functional role of facial muscle responses under different processing conditions: Participants task was to intentionally categorize clearly visible emotional facial expressions (Exp. 1) of five emotion categories, or to categorize neutral-looking faces with regard to the allegedly felt emotion (i.e., joy, anger, fear, sadness, disgust) in a masked emotion misattribution procedure (Exp. 2). In both experiments, activity of five facial muscles as well as behavioral responses were assessed on a trial-by-trial basis.
Results revealed emotion-specific facial muscle activity and correct categorization for visible intentional processing. Under masked presentation conditions, a specific behavioral pattern of emotion-congruent as well as cross-category misattributions was observed (e.g., anger-fear) similar to Rohr et al. (2015). Importantly, the observed facial muscle activity mirrored the cross-category misattributions and multi-level analyses showed that the activity contributed partially to the choice of the behavioral response. We discuss whether this pattern of results indicates an emotional reaction to the primes which is fed into the behavioral decision, or whether a semantic concept is inferred and then simulated.
In the present study, we investigated the functional role of facial muscle responses under different processing conditions: Participants task was to intentionally categorize clearly visible emotional facial expressions (Exp. 1) of five emotion categories, or to categorize neutral-looking faces with regard to the allegedly felt emotion (i.e., joy, anger, fear, sadness, disgust) in a masked emotion misattribution procedure (Exp. 2). In both experiments, activity of five facial muscles as well as behavioral responses were assessed on a trial-by-trial basis.
Results revealed emotion-specific facial muscle activity and correct categorization for visible intentional processing. Under masked presentation conditions, a specific behavioral pattern of emotion-congruent as well as cross-category misattributions was observed (e.g., anger-fear) similar to Rohr et al. (2015). Importantly, the observed facial muscle activity mirrored the cross-category misattributions and multi-level analyses showed that the activity contributed partially to the choice of the behavioral response. We discuss whether this pattern of results indicates an emotional reaction to the primes which is fed into the behavioral decision, or whether a semantic concept is inferred and then simulated.
Keywords: misattribution, emotion, affect, implicit processing, facial muscle activity, EMG, masked