16:30 - 18:00
Talk Session III
+
16:30 - 18:00
Mon-HS1-Talk III-
Mon-Talk III-
Room: HS1
Chair/s:
Barbara E. Marschallek, Maria Manolika, Thomas Jacobsen
With the publication of Gustav Theodor Fechner’s Vorschule der Ästhetik, the year 1876 marks the beginning of Experimental Aesthetics, which is the second-oldest branch of Experimental Psychology. In his major work, Fechner suggested the study of aesthetics "from below", applying empirical knowledge. To date, the Experimental Aesthetics enjoys a growing number of researches from different fields of Psychology. The present symposia, therefore, comprise contributions investigating a variety of domains including, for example, live performances, materials, and tattoos, Furthermore, questions of the influence of several stimuli’s and individual’s characteristics, including but not
limited to complexity, memory resources, personality differences, and types of stimuli, are addressed.
An Art-Specific State of Mind? Immoral Behaviour is Evaluated Less Negatively in The Context of Art
Mon-HS1-Talk III-01
Presented by: Itay Goetz
Itay Goetz 1, 2, 3, Lara Bernhardt 1, Vanessa Leonie Kauffman 1, Friederike Margareta Karg 1, Alexander Pastukhov 1, 2, 3, Claus-Christian Carbon 1, 2, 3
1 Department of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany., 2 Research Group EPÆG (Ergonomics, Psychological Æsthetics, Gestalt), Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany., 3 Bamberg Graduate School of Affective and Cognitive Sciences (BaGrACS), Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany.
Why is it that when we encounter a urinal in a museum space we stop, explore its aesthetic features,
think about its meaning, get upset, surprised or excited, and when we see a urinal
in the nearby toilets we approach it as a utilitarian object, rarely if ever wonder about its
shape, colour or meaning? Philosophers have long debated whether people enter a specific
state of mind when they experience art, which makes them view even everyday objects
through a different lens. Previous research has shown that people accept more
negative emotions, which in everyday life they tend to avoid, in the context of art, thus
potentially pointing that people enter a specific state of mind when engaging with art. In the
current study participants (N=64) rated immoral behaviour as less negative in the context of art,
which further suggests that different cognitive operations may be in place in this context.
To create greater conceptual unity and provide a framework for future research, we propose
the concept of Mode of Art eXperience (MAX), which brings together accounts spanning
2500 years of inquiry into this state of mind. We conclude that MAX is essential for
maximising the art experience, not in utilitarian terms, but in terms of having a boundary-less
meaningful engagement with art.
Keywords: Empirical aesthetics, Art, SeIns, Mode of art, Immorality, Morality, Negative emotions.