Submission 88
Social Identity and Human-AI Task Allocation
Panel 1-Multi-Function Room 1 (19/F LAU)-03
Presented by: Yiting Chen
We extend social identity theory to study human-AI trade-offs in hiring contexts. In a baseline experiment, representative U.S. participants allocate tasks between a human worker and either another human, ChatGPT, or the foreign model DeepSeek, with explicitly varied productivity. On average, people incur costs to under-allocate tasks to AI, particularly DeepSeek. Two additional experiments, inducing identities on workers via minimal-group and political affiliations, reveal a hierarchy: in-group humans receive the most, followed comparably by out-group humans and in-group AI, and out-group AI receives the fewest. Individual perceived social distance to AI and groupy tendency jointly shape the task allocation decisions.