17:00 - 19:00
Fri-S9
Goethe Hall
Chair/s:
Thomas Hummel
The sense of smell is plastic. This plasticity is based on the regenerative capacity of the olfactory mucosa. The regeneration is the basis for recovery after olfactory loss which is especially significant since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In COVID19 the virus attacks the olfactory mucosa and olfactory receptor neurons are destroyed during the process of the disease. During recovery, ORNs are regrown from the globose basal cells. In addition to these changes at a peripheral level, the volume of the olfactory bulb also changes in relation to olfactory function. The same has been shown for the primary and secondary olfactory cortex where also changein functional responsiveness have been observed. It appears that the effectiveness of “olfactory training” is based on these effects.
Aim of the symposium is to highlight these plastic changes at several levels. To this end a group of excellent researchers will present work that touches upon several aspects of plasticity in the chemical senses. In terms of career levels the group is mixed, with a PhD student, four relatively young colleagues in their early career, and one established senior colleagues.
Because of the high significance of this topic in terms of recovery from COVID-19 associated olfactory loss we believe that it is highly attractive to ECRO participants!
Compensation of sensory loss and effects of olfactory training on chemosensory and cognitive function
Fri-S9-004
Presented by: Anna Oleszkiewicz
Anna Oleszkiewicz
Smell and Taste Clinic, TU Dresden, Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw
Constant alterations of the olfactory system as a result of interaction with the chemosensory environment are a matter of interdisciplinary interest. Studies have shown that exposure to odors leads to changes at both peripheral and central levels of the olfactory system, and this may result from both bottom-up and top-down processes. It seems reasonable to expect that the olfactory system would adapt to sensory loss and compensate for the lack of visual or auditory input. Yet, results in this regard are contradictory, reporting either enhanced olfactory performance in blindness or no significant difference between people with blindness and their respective control groups. Inspired by this discrepancy, we have conducted a series of studies comparing people with blindness and people with deafness, with their respective control groups (sighted or blind, respectively). This work led us to the general conclusion of no major advantage of people with blindness over sighted people in the behavioural response to odours, but we did observe decreased chemosensory performance in people with deafness.
Plasticity of the olfactory system has also been used in the rehabilitation of people with olfactory loss (anosmia). Olfactory training (OT) is a systematic exposure to a defined set of odorants – e.g., lemon, rose, cloves, and eucalyptus, twice a day over the period of at least 12 weeks. OT has been found to effectively rehabilitate the sense of smell, particularly in patients who lost their sense of smell due to a viral infection. Given the proximity of the brain structures responsible for olfactory processing and the limbic system, we hypothesized that OT may be beneficial for cognitive and emotional processing. Presented evidence suggests that the effects of OT may extend beyond olfactory performance and provide support in cognitive aging and emotional development.