15:30 - 17:00
Fri-P2
Planck Lobby & Meitner Hall
Objective and subjective perception of different chemosensory stimuli by healthy subjects
Fri-P2-061
Presented by: Sally Arnhardt
Sally Arnhardt 1, Annkatrin Wunder 1, Janina Ludwig 1, Selina Scheid 1, Iryna Ruda 1, Tobias Härtl 3, Leo Schwinn 5, Johannes Kornhuber 1, Nicolas Rohleder 2, Helene Loos 3, 4, Jessica Freiherr 1, 4
1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany, 2 Chair of Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstrasse 49a, 91052 Erlangen, Germany, 3 Chair of Aroma and Smell Research, Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestrasse 9, 91054 Erlangen, Germany, 4 Department Sensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Giggenhauser Str. 35, 85354 Freising, Germany, 5 Machine Learning and Data Analytics Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Carl-Thiersch-Strasse 2b, 91052 Erlangen, Germany
Human chemosignals originating from axillary sweat are becoming increasingly attractive in neuroscience research. In this study, we were particularly interested in the subjective and objective perception of chemosignals sampled during a TSST and a friendly version of the TSST concerning the time and the body region of sampling. Participants were asked to rate intensity, pleasantness, dominance, arousal, masculinity/femininity, and sexual attractiveness of the samples using visual analog scales. We did not determine significant differences between the two stress conditions (TSST/friendly TSST) but demonstrated significant differences in the perception of stress sweat concerning sampling time. Samples donated during the stress test were rated as more unpleasant, less sexually attractive, and more male-related than samples donated before and after the stress test. Regarding the body region, neck samples were evaluated as more pleasant, sexually attractive, and feminine-related, while armpit samples were rated as more intense, arousing, and dominant.
During objective assessment by a trained panel, the samples were characterized as sweaty-mouldy, sulphury and grapefruit-like. Additionally, sweat samples from the armpit collected during the stress test were evaluated as most arousing and dominant.
With this research, we were not only able to characterize stress sweat with attributes in a descriptive manner but did also prove that sampling during the stress test shows the most potent behavioral response. Finally, we here show differences in perception of stress sweat from different body regions, which can be important for subsequent attractiveness-specific chemosignal studies.