15:00 - 16:30
Submission 527
A Matter of Encoding? – How Reward Salient Sounds Interfere with Visual Working Memory
Posterwall-03
Presented by: Marlene Rösner
Marlene Rösner 1, 2, 3, Laura-Isabelle Klatt 4, 5, 6, Damiano Grinoholio 1, 7, Oscar Ferrante 1, 8, Clayton Hickey 1
1 Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
2 Developmental Psychology, University of Magdeburg, Germany
3 Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
4 Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
5 Institute for Medical Psychology, University of Frankfurt, Germany
6 Leibniz Institute for Working Environment and Human Factors, Germany
7 Center for Mind and Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Italy
8 School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

Stimuli that have led to a positive outcome (a reward) in previous encounters draw attention resulting in enhanced processing. This has been shown to generalize to new contexts in which no reward is given in both perception and working memory (WM). However, these experiments usually consider only one modality at a time. This unimodal approach does not do justice to the sensory complexity of natural environments. Pooresmaeli et al. (2014) addressed this gap by demonstrating a cross-modal value-driven enhancement of visual processing by the presentation of reward salient auditory stimuli.

This MEG study investigates cross-modal value-driven effects in WM. Participants performed interleaved blocks of two tasks: In a sounds localization task, participants learned to associate two sounds with a high and low reward, respectively. In a WM task, they compared a memorized orientation to the orientation of a probe stimulus. Critically, the sounds, albeit task-irrelevant, were concurrently presented during encoding or maintenance, allowing us to assess which WM subprocess might be susceptible to value-driven interference.

Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed lower accuracy when high compared to low reward salient sounds were presented during encoding. There was no value driven effect of sounds presented during memory maintenance. Thus, WM encoding seems to be more susceptible to cross-modal value-driven interference than maintenance. Ongoing MEG analyses will give further insights on cross-modal value-driven effects on representational strength of WM content and attentional selection during encoding and maintenance.