16:30 - 18:00
Parallel sessions 6
16:30 - 18:00
Room: HSZ - N9
Chair/s:
Thomas Jacobsen, Bettina Rolke
Our aesthetic experience of external stimuli is shaped by our cultural and individual backgrounds, as well as by various perceptual, cognitive and emotional processes. Empirical research has identified numerous factors that influence our aesthetic perception of stimuli, including their characteristics and the context in which stimuli are perceived. Recently, the question has also been raised about the impact of engaging with art on other areas of life. This symposium will present various approaches to empirical aesthetics research. In the first talk, Barbara Mühlbauer will ask whether two evaluation methods — rating and pairwise comparison — produce comparable aesthetic judgements and how stable these judgements remain over time. Claudia Muth's second talk will address how specific stimulus characteristics, such as the complexity of visual matrix patterns and ambivalence in artistic photographs, influence various components of aesthetic perception. She will also report results concerning the relationship between these characteristics and eye movements. In the third talk, Ronald Hübner will explore potential causes of individual preferences for different visual spiral patterns, attributing them to individual creative dispositions. In the fourth talk, Gemma Schino will explore the affective and cognitive changes that arise from engaging with meaningful artwork through interactive analysis and interaction with others. She will present a model that considers the interactive contribution of affect and cognitive strategies, drawing a connection to the general influence of emotional processes on cognition. In the final talk, Jan-Filip Tameling will present a cognitive network model mapping the concepts relevant to experiencing art. He will propose a visual art schema that could help identify the cognitive mechanisms involved in aesthetic experiences. Overall, the symposium provides a comprehensive insight into the multifaceted world of empirical aesthetics research, offering an overview of the various approaches, models, and perspectives employed.
Submission 224
The Visual Art Schema: A Cognitive Network Analysis of Content and Structure
SymposiumTalk-05
Presented by: Thomas Jacobsen
Jan-Filip TamelingValentin WagnerThomas Jacobsen
Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut-Schmidt-University, Germany
Interpreting a situation as an art reception situation alters how stimuli are perceived and evaluated. Theories of aesthetic experience highlight this recognition of an art context as a crucial precondition for aesthetic processing. However, the cognitive basis of this recognition remains underspecified. Existing models either omit a cognitive account altogether or refer to an art schema, the mental representation of art reception, as a narrative placeholder. We address this gap by developing a network model of the art schema that—grounded in schema theory—empirically explicates its content and structure. In a first study, participants provided free-listings to identify the most important concepts associated with situations of visual art reception. In a second study, pairwise association ratings for those concepts were collected to construct a weighted concept network, which we analyzed with graph-theoretical metrics to assess its structure. This empirically derived network model of the art schema encompasses central aspects of art situations, including artworks, the exhibition environment, and the responses they elicit, encompassing emotional, behavioral, and cognitive dimensions. Its structure is highly cohesive and efficiently organized, with structural features indicating dense interconnections, integrated organization, and rapid activation. Hierarchical clustering further revealed nested subschemata, suggesting a hierarchical and interconnected organization. These findings provide the first empirically grounded, specified model of the art schema, clarifying how recognition of art contexts is realized and what cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions it guides.