16:30 - 18:00
Parallel sessions 6
16:30 - 18:00
Room: HSZ - N9
Chair/s:
Thomas Jacobsen, Bettina Rolke
Our aesthetic experience of external stimuli is shaped by our cultural and individual backgrounds, as well as by various perceptual, cognitive and emotional processes. Empirical research has identified numerous factors that influence our aesthetic perception of stimuli, including their characteristics and the context in which stimuli are perceived. Recently, the question has also been raised about the impact of engaging with art on other areas of life. This symposium will present various approaches to empirical aesthetics research. In the first talk, Barbara Mühlbauer will ask whether two evaluation methods — rating and pairwise comparison — produce comparable aesthetic judgements and how stable these judgements remain over time. Claudia Muth's second talk will address how specific stimulus characteristics, such as the complexity of visual matrix patterns and ambivalence in artistic photographs, influence various components of aesthetic perception. She will also report results concerning the relationship between these characteristics and eye movements. In the third talk, Ronald Hübner will explore potential causes of individual preferences for different visual spiral patterns, attributing them to individual creative dispositions. In the fourth talk, Gemma Schino will explore the affective and cognitive changes that arise from engaging with meaningful artwork through interactive analysis and interaction with others. She will present a model that considers the interactive contribution of affect and cognitive strategies, drawing a connection to the general influence of emotional processes on cognition. In the final talk, Jan-Filip Tameling will present a cognitive network model mapping the concepts relevant to experiencing art. He will propose a visual art schema that could help identify the cognitive mechanisms involved in aesthetic experiences. Overall, the symposium provides a comprehensive insight into the multifaceted world of empirical aesthetics research, offering an overview of the various approaches, models, and perspectives employed.
Submission 137
Aesthetic Preferences for Spirals: A Window into Creative Cognition
SymposiumTalk-03
Presented by: Ronald Hübner
Ronald Hübner
University of Konstanz, Germany
The interplay between universal principles and individual variability in aesthetic preferences remains a fundamental question in art and design. Considerable individual differences observed even for simple stimuli such as rectangles support Fechner's (1866) early view that preferences are due to both innate mechanisms and acquired associations. This is consistent with our recent work, which shows that the preferences for simple design elements such as different types of spirals also vary individually. In particular, we were able to identify different subgroups: Some participants preferred golden spirals over Archimedean spirals, others showed the opposite pattern, and a third group showed a slight preference for logarithmic spirals. Although personality traits did not clearly correlate with these preferences, initial evidence suggested a relationship between the preference groups and creativity. To further explore this, a subsequent study not only required participants to choose among the three spiral types but also to articulate their reason and associations. The findings strongly indicate that individuals preferring the golden spiral tend to exhibit higher creativity than those favoring the Archimedean spiral. This observation was corroborated by a further experiment with design experts and artists. They showed a significantly higher preference for golden spirals compared to a control group. Overall, these studies suggest that a preference for relatively simple design elements, such as spirals, can serve as an indicator of a person's creative disposition.