16:30 - 18:00
Parallel sessions 6
16:30 - 18:00
Room: HSZ - N9
Chair/s:
Thomas Jacobsen, Bettina Rolke
Our aesthetic experience of external stimuli is shaped by our cultural and individual backgrounds, as well as by various perceptual, cognitive and emotional processes. Empirical research has identified numerous factors that influence our aesthetic perception of stimuli, including their characteristics and the context in which stimuli are perceived. Recently, the question has also been raised about the impact of engaging with art on other areas of life. This symposium will present various approaches to empirical aesthetics research. In the first talk, Barbara Mühlbauer will ask whether two evaluation methods — rating and pairwise comparison — produce comparable aesthetic judgements and how stable these judgements remain over time. Claudia Muth's second talk will address how specific stimulus characteristics, such as the complexity of visual matrix patterns and ambivalence in artistic photographs, influence various components of aesthetic perception. She will also report results concerning the relationship between these characteristics and eye movements. In the third talk, Ronald Hübner will explore potential causes of individual preferences for different visual spiral patterns, attributing them to individual creative dispositions. In the fourth talk, Gemma Schino will explore the affective and cognitive changes that arise from engaging with meaningful artwork through interactive analysis and interaction with others. She will present a model that considers the interactive contribution of affect and cognitive strategies, drawing a connection to the general influence of emotional processes on cognition. In the final talk, Jan-Filip Tameling will present a cognitive network model mapping the concepts relevant to experiencing art. He will propose a visual art schema that could help identify the cognitive mechanisms involved in aesthetic experiences. Overall, the symposium provides a comprehensive insight into the multifaceted world of empirical aesthetics research, offering an overview of the various approaches, models, and perspectives employed.
Submission 117
Stimulating Potentiality: Effects of Variation and Ambivalence on Interest
SymposiumTalk-02
Presented by: Claudia Muth
Claudia Muth
Hof University of Applied Sciences, Germany
Group EPÆG (Ergonomics, Psychological Æsthetics, Gestalt), Bamberg, Germany
A potential for meaningful experiences can cause interest and motivate active perception – especially when perceptual routines are challenged. We examined two phenomena that might offer such a stimulating potentiality in very different ways: (a) complex variation of perceptual order in patterns and (b) awareness of ambivalence in artistic photographs. (a) Students trained in design and/or fine arts created visual patterns on a 6×6 grid. These patterns were rated by another group block-wise on a 7-point scale on liking, interest and stimulation. Additionally, they reported on why some of the presented images might have stimulated them. Complex variations of elements (but not deviations from order) were more interesting and stimulating than repetitions. Obviousness of order seemed relevant for liking only. And qualitative reports highlighted the stimulating potentiality of perceptual transformation and incompleteness. (b) In another study, we manipulated participants’ awareness of the ambivalence of photographed scenes by asking them to explore positive and negative interpretations of each image. Ratings of ambivalence were positively related to those of interest; the latter even increased after listing positive and negative interpretations. The effect of ambivalence on interest was also shown in a follow-up study using eye tracking in a forced-choice design: Participants chose ambivalent photographs more often and looked slightly longer at them when asked which of two images they wanted to learn more about. We consider perceptual and affective dynamics underlying the reported effects and discuss the role of experience in art and design, individual goals, and (artistic) context.