16:30 - 18:00
Parallel sessions 6
16:30 - 18:00
Room: HSZ - N5
Chair/s:
Wiebke Hemming, Fabian E. Gümüsdagli
Prospective memory (PM) refers to the ability to remember intended actions and execute them at a specific time point (time-based PM) or in response to a specific event (event-based PM) in the future (for an overview, see Bayen et al., 2024). PM is pivotal for goal-directed behavior in everyday life, and everyday errors frequently involve PM failures (Crovitz & Daniel, 1984; Kvavilashvili et al., 2001; Terry, 1988). Over the past decades, PM research has evolved into a broad field encompassing laboratory paradigms, naturalistic studies, neurophysiological studies and metacognitive and cognitive modeling approaches. Despite this progress, many of the key questions remain unanswered about the mechanisms supporting PM across different contexts, time frames, and age groups. 
This symposium brings together recent advances from diverse domains of PM research. The first talk focuses on the functional neuroanatomy of event-based and time-based PM in healthy older adults. The second talk examines age differences in metacognitive monitoring and control processes in PM, focusing on how these mechanisms support the management of intentions across adulthood. The third talk focuses on a metacognitive path model of time-based PM, tested empirically on multiple datasets. The fourth talk introduces a novel bi-factor modeling approach that separates bottom-up spontaneous retrieval from top-down preparatory processes in event-based PM. Finally, the fifth talk introduces a new cognitive model that disentangles the prospective component—remembering that something must be done—and the retrospective components of event-based PM, namely remembering what must be done and when. Together, this symposium provides an integrative perspective on current theoretical and methodological developments in PM research and concludes with a discussion of challenges in measuring PM performance and promising directions for future work.
Submission 125
Age Differences in Monitoring and Control: Metacognitive Insights into Prospective Memory
SymposiumTalk-02
Presented by: Chiara Scarampi
Chiara Scarampi 1, 2, Sam Gilbert 3, Matthias Kliegel 1, 2, 4
1 Centre for the Interdisciplinary Study of Gerontology and Vulnerability (CIGEV), University of Geneva, Switzerland
2 Swiss National Center of Competences in Research LIVES – Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives, Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland
3 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, United Kingdom
4 Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Remembering to carry out intended actions in the future – such as taking medication or attending an appointment – is essential for maintaining autonomy and independence in everyday life. As we grow older, this ability, known as prospective memory, can become more challenging. Yet, people are not passive in the face of cognitive change: they adapt by using strategies to support their memory. One important mechanism that enables such adaptation is metacognition – our capacity to reflect on and regulate our own thinking. Metacognition involves two key processes: monitoring, or evaluating how well we are doing, and control, or adjusting our behavior based on that evaluation. Effective cognition depends on the dynamic interaction between these two processes. For instance, recognizing that we might forget an intention can lead us to set an external reminder, a strategy that can protect against everyday cognitive failures and help maintain successful everyday functioning. In this talk, I will present recent studies comparing younger and older adults to examine age differences in how metacognitive monitoring and control support prospective remembering. I will discuss how people decide when to rely on external reminders, how accurately they judge their own memory performance, and how contextual factors – such as age-related stereotype threat – can influence these metacognitive processes. Together, these findings highlight both age-related differences and shared adaptive mechanisms, offering new insights into how metacognition supports flexible strategy use and the maintenance of independence across adulthood.