Submission 279
Proactive Control During Bilingual Comprehension: Terms and Conditions Apply
SymposiumTalk-01
Presented by: Aaron Vandendaele
Bilingual language control is commonly described as the ability to manage cross-language interference. Whilst most traditional research has studied this process through reactive control, recent work has shown increased interest in a possible role for proactive control. In the current work, we investigated whether proactive control mechanisms can also be observed during language comprehension, where the need for language control is assumed to be smaller than in production. Across two experiments, Italian–English bilinguals performed a cued semantic categorization task in which cues were either informative or uninformative about the upcoming language. Experiment 1 employed arbitrarily colored cues, while Experiment 2 used more ecologically valid flag cues. Experiment 1 showed robust switch costs in the reaction times, indicating evidence for reactive strategies. However, Experiment 2 demonstrated an interaction between cue informativity and language transition: participants were more accurate on switch trials when preceded by an informative cue, suggesting a proactive benefit. On top of this, the same benefit was also present in the reaction times, but only when greater language control was needed (i.e., when participants needed to switch back to their L1). These findings provide novel evidence that proactive control can be engaged during bilingual comprehension, but its implementation is dependent on the strategic activation of language cues in the environment. We further argue that proactive control is costly and is recruited only when the benefits outweigh the expenditure, complementing reactive processes rather than replacing them.