Submission 608
Klokka or Klocka? The Precision of Memory for Newly Learned L2 Words and the Role of Prior Knowledge
SymposiumTalk-03
Presented by: Elena Markantonakis
Previous memory research has shown that prior knowledge facilitates retention of item information but hinders memory for intra-item details (Bellana et al., 2021), possibly leading to the formation of more generalized representations due to schema-based processing. In the language domain, it has been shown that cognates are better remembered than non-cognates, suggesting that word form overlap constitutes a beneficial type of prior knowledge for L2 vocabulary acquisition (Lotto & de Groot, 1998, de Vos et al., 2019). However, what constitutes intra-item detail and whether the previously found hindering effect of prior knowledge applies in the context of foreign word learning remains unclear. We examined the role of word form overlap on memory for the specific orthography of newly learned words. Dutch native participants learned pseudo-Swedish words, half of them ‘cognates’ with Dutch and the other half non-cognates, by being presented with pictures of objects and the written and spoken words. Crucially, all words contained one of five ambiguous letter bigrams that had the same pronunciation, but were spelled in two possible ways across the word set (e.g., “ck” or “kk”). Then, participants were prompted to type the newly learned words on presentation of the picture. We additionally employed a subsequent 4AFC recognition task which contained, as two of the options, the correct word with both possible spellings of the critical bigram (e.g., “klocka” or “klokka”, meaning clock). In the (not yet available) results, we expect more cognates to be recalled in general, but with less precise spelling than (recalled) non-cognates.