09:00 - 10:30
Parallel sessions 4
09:00 - 10:30
Room: C-Building - N14
Chair/s:
Kathrin Finke, Ingrid Scharlau, Jan Tünnermann
The Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) continues to be developed as a powerful quantitative framework for understanding attentional selection and capacity. Current research applies TVA across diverse contexts and methodologies. This symposium presents new theoretical developments, methodological advances, and applied perspectives that extend TVA’s reach and precision and sometimes challenge its present state. Estela Carmona investigates how self-relevant information shapes attentional parameters, offering insights into the role of personal significance in visual selection. Anders Petersen follows by introducing advances in modeling enumeration data within the TVA framework, extending the set of tasks that can be used with TVA. Kai Biermeier, Ngoc Chi Banh, and Ingrid Scharlau test the applicability of TVA to online scenarios and identify methodological challenges in the online estimation of attentional processing speed. Tobias Peters, Kai Biermeier, and Ingrid Scharlau apply TVA measures of attention to human–AI interaction, examining whether attentional signatures can indicate adaptive distrust. Finally, Jan Tünnermann and Ingrid Scharlau revisit lateral asymmetries in visual processing, presenting updated findings on left–right visual field differences within TVA. Together, these contributions demonstrate the continuing vitality of TVA research and its capacity to inform theoretical, methodological, and applied perspectives on visual attention but also challenges that have to be addressed. Part 2 of the symposium will turn to attentional changes in diverse populations. 
Submission 601
A TVA-Based Investigation of Hemifield Differences Across Varying Stimulus Configurations
SymposiumTalk-05
Presented by: Jan Tünnermann
Jan Tünnermann 1, Ingrid Scharlau 2
1 Charlotte Fresenius University of Psychology, Cologne, Germany
2 Paderborn University, Germany
Earlier findings from our Temporal-Order Judgment (TOJ) studies showed a mixed pattern of hemifield effects, hinting that Left Visual Field (LVF) advantages may diminish when attention is narrowly focused. To examine this more directly, we introduced a new stimulus arrangement in which one item always appeared at the currently fixated location while the probe was shown peripherally at multiple positions. Using TVA modeling, we analyzed this new configuration and contrasted it with our earlier series of experiments involving two peripheral stimuli. In conditions of more focused attention, we found no evidence for LVF advantages. We speculate that LVF benefits arise under default or uncertain attentional states but disappear when attention is strongly bound to a known location. These findings clarify how attentional focus and stimulus arrangement combine to shape temporal-order judgments and demonstrate the value of TVA for investigating hemifield asymmetries.