Submission 170
Source Effects in Memory for Truth and Falsity: A Comparison of Self-Generated Judgments and External Feedback
SymposiumTalk-05
Presented by: Lena Nadarevic
Correcting misinformation is one of the key challenges of our time. However, debunking interventions show only limited success. Memory processes may contribute to this problem; for instance, people may be better at remembering their initial, subjective assessment of the veracity of information than they are at remembering externally provided, objective veracity feedback. Indeed, research on the generation effect suggests that self-generated information benefits from deeper processing and is therefore remembered particularly well. However, there is little research on whether this effect also applies to the generation of source or veracity information. To address this question, participants studied individual statements, some of which were presented together with “true” or “false” feedback in the feedback group, or judged as “true” or “false” in the judgment group. Data from a subsequent memory test were analyzed using a multinomial source memory model to disentangle memory for the statements, memory for the (judged) veracity of the statements, and different guessing processes. The analyses indicated a generation effect for both the statements and their (judged) veracity. Hence, as predicted, participants show better memory for their own veracity judgments than for external veracity feedback. Future research will investigate whether this also applies when self-generated judgments are combined with external feedback in a within-subject design.