Submission 348
Source Memory and Metamemory for Concrete and Abstract Words
SymposiumTalk-03
Presented by: Désirée N. Schönung
Previous research has demonstrated that concrete words are remembered better than abstract words and that participants can anticipate this advantage in their judgments of learning (JOLs). The present study examined whether individuals can distinguish item from source memory (e.g., memory for the speaker of a word) in their metacognitive monitoring by also providing judgments of source (JOSs) for abstract and concrete words. We hypothesized that word concreteness would not affect source memory. Consequently, given that participants can distinguish their predictions for item and source memory, we hypothesized they use this item cue less—or not at all—when making JOSs. A total of 106 university students participated in a laboratory experiment in which they studied concrete and abstract nouns presented by either a male or a female speaker. After each item–source pair, participants provided both a JOL and a JOS. As expected, participants predicted and exhibited higher item memory for concrete compared with abstract nouns. However, contrary to our hypothesis, source memory also benefited from word concreteness. Consistent with this finding, participants incorporated concreteness into their JOSs, though to a lesser extent than in their JOLs. These results suggest that the item-cue concreteness is differentially weighed when making JOLs versus JOSs in line with the idea of metacognitive distinction between these two memory types. Given the unexpected effect of item concreteness on source memory, however, it remains unclear whether a cue selectively influencing item memory only would be fully discounted in JOSs.