16:30 - 18:00
Parallel sessions 3
16:30 - 18:00
Room: HSZ - N1
Chair/s:
Ryan Patrick Hackländer, Magdalena Abel
The scientific study of human memory can be approached from many different angles, for example by focusing on basic questions about memory or on questions that arise with regard to memory in daily life or in applied settings. This symposium will showcase the great variety of current memory research by bringing together researchers who pursue different research questions – some of them addressing basic characteristics of memory, others addressing memory in application. The first talk by Mohammad Hamzeloo will consider how odors can be turned into associative cues that are effective in evoking memories. The second talk by Mira Schwarz and Kai Homburger will examine how memories of odors can shape spatial orientation and support smell-based navigation. The third talk by Alp Aslan will look into memory for object locations and forgetting effects mediated by selective memory retrieval. The fourth talk by Jan Rummel and Luca Leon Bieling will deal with eyewitness source memory and the influence of ethnic bias on the cheater-detection benefit. Finally, the fifth talk by Marius Böltzig will focus on collective remembering, in particular future thinking of Ukrainians during the Russian invasion of their country. In addition to the five talks, a final discussion slot will provide an opportunity to discuss overlap and joint themes across studies, as well as potential avenues for future research.
Submission 133
„We Will Be Free“: The Wartime Positivity Effect in Collective Future Thinking in Ukraine
SymposiumTalk-05
Presented by: Marius Boeltzig
Marius Boeltzig
University of Münster, Germany
Even in adverse conditions, people imagine what their own future and that of their country will look like. While previous work has established that crises like the COVID-19 pandemic make people less optimistic about their future, no study has investigated future thinking during an ongoing war. In an online survey study, Ukrainian participants (n = 377) as well as German (n = 239) and Polish (n = 207) controls were asked to imagine both their personal future, and the future of their respective countries. Surprisingly, Ukrainians felt significantly more positive about the future of their country than Germans and Poles and had a stronger sense of being able to actively shape it. This remarkable wartime positivity effect was even stronger in participants who were more impacted by the war. Additionally, personal and collective future thinking were more merged in Ukraine than the control countries. The usual split of higher positivity about the personal compared to the collective future was reduced in Ukraine. Additionally, Ukrainians mentioned collective events and their country more often, even when discussing their personal future. The results indicate that under extreme circumstances, personal and collective future thinking can be more aligned, as the fate of the nation is more coupled with the fate of the individual, and more positive, as the adversity of war can also be seen as an opportunity for change.