16:30 - 18:00
Parallel sessions 3
16:30 - 18:00
Room: HSZ - N2
Chair/s:
Jan Pohl
With the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence technologies and increased media coverage of robots, humans are becoming more aware of artificial agents, some even testing them by interacting with online agents like chatbots. This exposure provides a unique opportunity to study how humans generalize social perception beyond biological agents, offering insights into the flexibility and boundaries of social cognition.
Understanding how people perceive and interact with these agents is central not only to the design of effective human-robot collaboration but also to uncovering fundamental aspects of social cognition. When and why do people attribute sociality, intentionality, or even moral capacities to machines? And how do seemingly simple cues in robot behavior shape complex human perceptions?
This symposium brings together five empirical contributions investigating the psychological mechanisms underlying complex attributions toward robots in diverse interaction contexts. It explores how perceptions of a robot’s social nature influence cooperative engagement and trust, how subtle behavioral or paralinguistic cues shape impressions of humanness and identity, and how movement patterns guide inferences about underlying intentions or mental capabilities.
Taken together, these investigations reveal how both low-level perceptual cues and higher-order cognitive evaluations jointly shape human responses in collaborative and observational contexts, offering new insights into how social cognition operates at the boundary between human and artificial agents.
The series of talks aims to foster interdisciplinary discussion among experimental psychologists, cognitive scientists, and roboticists, offering new insights into how humans make sense of increasingly social machines and what this reveals about the architecture of human social cognition.
Submission 383
Paths of Perception: From Robot Navigation to Mind Attribution
SymposiumTalk-04
Presented by: Kristina Nikolovska
Kristina Nikolovska
Constructor University, Germany
n everyday interaction, people readily interpret simple motion cues as meaningful indicators of an agent’s internal states. While much work on robot behaviour emphasizes complex social signals or isolates single navigation cues, it remains unclear whether basic movement features—such as changes in speed, trajectory, approach direction, or interpersonal distance—are sufficient to shape broader judgments of intention, agency, and social awareness. The present research examines the perceptual pathways through which users evaluate these minimal movement cues and how such cues give rise to mind-related attributions.

In a first study, participants evaluated three robot embodiments to determine how physical form shapes baseline assumptions about agency and social competence. The results showed that embodiment alone produced no systematic differences; instead, participants’ perceptions varied primarily as a function of how the robots moved. In a second study, participants reported detailed expectations for how robots should behave while navigating—how close they should pass, from which direction they should approach, how their speed should change, and how perceptually present they should appear in shared space. These responses revealed strong, cue-specific preferences even for very simple movement features.

These insights form the foundation for a navigation experiment using the Pepper robot, in which the derived movement parameters were implemented to examine how simple adjustments shape user perception. Preliminary participant ratings indicate increased perceived animacy, safety, movement preference, and naturalness for the adjusted navigation. Together, the findings identify simple navigation cues as an important perceptual basis for mind attribution and user expectations in human–robot interaction.