Submission 392
Emotion Regulation as Protection Against Misinformation Biasing Brain Responses and Social Judgements
SymposiumTalk-01
Presented by: Julia Baum
In today’s (online) social world, misinformation reaches people through gossip, social media, and headlines, biasing social evaluations even when people doubt the information. This study tested how explicit emotion regulation can mitigate such biases investigating neurocognitive and behavioural correlates. In the exposure phase of the experiment, participants (N=30, preregistered) were exposed to person-related headlines from well-known German news sources (e.g., Tagesschau, Bild) that they unanimously evaluated as trustworthy or untrustworthy. Participants were reminded that news from untrustworthy sources could be false and that the person may not have acted as described, advising them to react less emotionally to both the person and the headline. In a subsequent judgement phase, participants judged the person presented in isolation while electrophysiological brain responses were recorded. As hypothesised, results showed that positive headlines led to more neutral judgements when the headlines were untrustworthy, with slow evaluative brain responses reflecting the effects of trustworthiness. For negative headlines, the intervention had more complex effects: negative information modulated fast, emotional and arousal-related brain responses only when headlines were trustworthy, whereas slow evaluative responses and social judgements were dominated by negative content regardless of trustworthiness. These findings show neurocognitive and behavioural correlates of how potential misinformation biases social evaluation and how emotion regulation can offer protection. The divergent effects of positive and negative content highlight cognitive mechanisms important for developing better strategies to counter misinformation.