16:30 - 18:00
Parallel sessions 3
16:30 - 18:00
Room: HSZ - N1
Chair/s:
Ryan Patrick Hackländer, Magdalena Abel
The scientific study of human memory can be approached from many different angles, for example by focusing on basic questions about memory or on questions that arise with regard to memory in daily life or in applied settings. This symposium will showcase the great variety of current memory research by bringing together researchers who pursue different research questions – some of them addressing basic characteristics of memory, others addressing memory in application. The first talk by Mohammad Hamzeloo will consider how odors can be turned into associative cues that are effective in evoking memories. The second talk by Mira Schwarz and Kai Homburger will examine how memories of odors can shape spatial orientation and support smell-based navigation. The third talk by Alp Aslan will look into memory for object locations and forgetting effects mediated by selective memory retrieval. The fourth talk by Jan Rummel and Luca Leon Bieling will deal with eyewitness source memory and the influence of ethnic bias on the cheater-detection benefit. Finally, the fifth talk by Marius Böltzig will focus on collective remembering, in particular future thinking of Ukrainians during the Russian invasion of their country. In addition to the five talks, a final discussion slot will provide an opportunity to discuss overlap and joint themes across studies, as well as potential avenues for future research.
Submission 207
From Novel to Familiar: Training Odors into Effective Associative Memory Cues
SymposiumTalk-01
Presented by: Mohammad Hamzeloo
Mohammad HamzelooLuisa BogenshützRyan HackländerChristina Bermeitinger
Institute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, Germany
Odors are powerful triggers of autobiographical memory, yet they often serve as weak cues in controlled associative learning tasks. This study examined whether increasing odor familiarity through training can enhance their effectiveness as associative memory cues. An experimental group first completed a four-week odor training phase in which they repeatedly smelled and rated a subset of initially low- and high-familiar odors. A control group received no such training. Both groups then performed an odor–picture paired-associate (PA) learning and then testing task.

Results showed that a 4-week odor training program, conducted weekly, significantly enhanced the efficacy of low-familiar odors in a PA memory paradigm. Specifically, trained low-familiar odors showed higher accuracy and faster reaction compared to untrained low-familiar odors in the experimental group. Low-familiar odors are thought to typically have weaker memory representations due to limited prior exposure, leading to lower accuracy and slower retrieval in memory tasks. Our results suggest that odor training, through repeated active exposure (e.g., odor-rating tasks), strengthens the cognitive and perceptual representations of low-familiar odors, thereby improving their effectiveness as cues in PA tasks.

These results highlight familiarity as a key factor in the formation and retrieval of odor-based associations. By moving odors along a continuum from novel to familiar, we can transform them into more effective memory cues. This work provides a framework for future studies comparing olfactory cue training to other sensory modalities and exploring how semantic and perceptual learning jointly determine the mnemonic power of odors.