Submission 578
ChatGPT and Machines? Understanding Mental Models and Preferences for AI and Robots in Germany
SymposiumTalk-05
Presented by: Asya Caroei
In Germany, artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly integrated into daily life, while the use of robots remains limited. While AI and robots could perform similar tasks in many application areas, they fundamentally differ in that robots have a physical presence, i.e., are embodied, as opposed to AI being an abstract algorithm running in the background of an application. Prior research generally links embodiment with positive user perceptions; however, recent evidence suggests that abstract, non-embodied AI systems are preferred over physically embodied robots. To examine this discrepancy, the present study surveyed a quota-based sample of the German population (N = 395). Participants evaluated AI and robots across service, security, and medical contexts providing free word associations used to assess mental models. Results revealed that although robots were, overall, perceived as more embodied and more positive, AI was consistently the preferred technology, particularly in service scenarios where human control is high. Robots were most associated with “Machine,” while AI was strongly linked to “ChatGPT,” indicating the influence of technological trends on public perception. Twelve percent of participants associated AI with “Danger,” representing a technology-skeptical subgroup that was older and had less formal education. These individuals showed no clear preference for AI or robots and tended to view both technologies as risky. Overall, Germans favor abstract AI systems over embodied robots despite more positive attitudes toward the latter. Context sensitivity and societal perceptions of control are crucial for the ethical and effective implementation of AI and robotics in Germany.