Submission 455
Perception of Human-Robot Relationships: Professional, Communicative, Impersonal and Emotionless
SymposiumTalk-01
Presented by: Monika Menz
Humans tend to ascribe social qualities not only to other people but also to non-human entities such as pets, toys, and robots. The present study examined how individuals distinguish between five types of relationship partners—a familiar person, a professional person, a pet, a cuddly toy, and a social robot—across three everyday contexts: caregiving, conversation, and leisure.
Applying the Repertory Grid Method, 103 participants generated 811 construct pairs, which were grouped into seven psychological dimensions: Verbal Communication, Assistance and Competences, Liveness and Humanity, Emotional and Empathic Ability, Autonomy and Voluntariness, Trust and Closeness, and Physical Activity and Responsiveness. Cluster analyses showed that in Verbal Communication and Assistance and Competences, robots were perceived comparably to human partners. In contrast, for Liveness and Humanity as well as Emotional and Empathic Ability, humans clustered together with pets and were clearly separated from robots and cuddly toys, indicating that robots are perceived as less animate and emotionally expressive. For Autonomy and Voluntariness and Trust and Closeness, robots aligned with professional humans, while familiar persons, pets, and cuddly toys formed a separate cluster. These results point to a dual perception of social robots: efficient collaborators on the one hand, but emotionally limited and socially constrained on the other. Identifying the underlying psychological dimensions of these perceptions advances the understanding of how people construct sociality, animacy, and emotional closeness in interactions with non-human agents.