09:00 - 10:30
Parallel sessions 1
09:00 - 10:30
Room: HSZ - N5
Chair/s:
Carina G. Giesen
A growing body of literature documents that perception and action are supported by short-lived bindings between stimulus and response features. Notably, the relationship of binding and retrieval processes and learning mechanisms is complex and a point of ongoing debate in current cognitive research. While the concepts of binding and retrieval as proposed in action control research, e.g., by the Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC) framework, closely resemble processes in learning and memory on a theoretical level, empirical findings largely oppose a close relation. In this symposium, we explore recent views on the relations between binding and retrieval and learning processes across different types of learning effects.
We will present findings from a broad range of experimental paradigms like stimulus-response and response-response binding, contingency learning, and evaluative conditioning.
These data will be used to highlight different perspectives on the intersections of binding and learning effects. Five talks will unravel how potent factors like contingency awareness, number and frequency of presentations, and time since the last stimulus occurrence affect binding/retrieval and/or learning effects. Together, these findings further our understanding of the relation between binding and learning.
Submission 197
The Durability of Bindings Between Distractor Stimuli and Responses Revisited – a Case for Contingency Awareness?
SymposiumTalk-01
Presented by: Birte Moeller
Birte Moeller 1, Carina Giesen 2
1 Trier University, Germany
2 HMU Erfurt, Germany
Typically, bindings between response irrelevant stimuli and responses completely decay within two seconds after their integration (Frings, 2011). However, it was shown that these associations between task irrelevant stimuli and responses were much longer lived if their particular combination was repeated five times (Frings et al., 2015). Here, we analyze whether this relative longevity of repeated stimulus-response bindings hinges on contingency awareness between stimulus and response. Participants judged the sizes of depicted objects that were presented to the left and right of a marked fixation. Different response irrelevant stimuli were used as fixation marks and were presented five times with the same response (but always with different targets). In addition, participants answered items indicating their contingency awareness. Preliminary data indicate that prolonged stimulus-response binding effects relied on awareness for the stimulus-response contingency. The data will be discussed regarding the interface between moment to moment effects of action control and longer term learning.