Grid-forming converters are expected to become a key capability for maintaining stability in power systems with high shares of inverter-based generation and storage. Their defining characteristic is not the injection of predefined active or reactive current, but voltage-source behavior behind an effective impedance. During severe disturbances, however, the resulting current may exceed the converter capability. Current limitation is therefore unavoidable, but introduces an additional degree of freedom: the current magnitude must be limited, while the current angle can either be preserved or deliberately modified to prioritize active or reactive current. This paper assesses active-current priority, reactive-current priority and current-angle neutral scaling from a system-level perspective. The results show that active- and reactive-current priority each support specific stability objectives, but their benefits depend on disturbance type and plant operating mode. Scaling preserves the direction of the unconstrained voltage-source response and avoids imposing a single-objective priority on the system. It is therefore proposed as the robust standard behavior for grid-forming converters under current limitation.