13:50 - 15:30
Room: Meeting Room 1.1
Chair/s:
Hoon Lee
Hung Chun Liu, Hsin Chih Chen - War Yet Unfought, Order Already Fractured?Reconsidering Variations and Rupture Points in International Institutions through Trump’s Reciprocal Tariff Initiative
Pavlos Koktsidis - Rearranging the Puzzle of Security in the Eastern Mediterranean: Exploring the Emergence of New Blocs of Power
Hoon Lee - The Glue of Peace: Economic Interdependence, Peace, and Rivalry Termination
Robert Person - Russian Information War in the Baltic States
Robert Brathwaite, Cameron Thies - Buying Hearts and Changing Minds: Impact of BRI on Information Environments
Submission 447
Russian Information War in the Baltic States
Panel.3-S-4
Presented by: Robert Person
Robert Person
United States Military Academy
This paper analyzes Russia’s information warfare strategy in the Baltic states—Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—since 2007, framing it as a core component of Moscow’s asymmetric approach to regional dominance and NATO disruption. Beginning with Estonia’s “Bronze Soldier” crisis, the study shows how Russia weaponized historical memory and ethnic divisions to destabilize these critical NATO allies, inaugurating tactics later deployed against Ukraine, the United States, and other European countries.

The paper identifies three Russian strategic objectives: eroding trust in democratic institutions, amplifying societal cleavages—especially between titular nationalities and Russian-speaking minorities—and weakening NATO solidarity. These aims are pursued through a layered toolkit: government-organized NGOs (GONGOs), cultural foundations like Russkiy Mir, and Russia’s “compatriots policy,” complemented by Russian state-controlled media and covert social media operations involving bots, trolls, and “information laundering.”

Russian narratives fall into two categories. Internal narratives depict the Baltics as fascist, Russophobic, and hostile to Russian language and culture, while glorifying the Soviet Union as liberator. External narratives undermine NATO by portraying it as an occupying force, questioning its commitment to Baltic security, and contrasting Western “decadence” with Russia’s defense of traditional values. These narratives have adapted to global developments, including the war in Ukraine, while maintaining their divisive thrust.

Drawing on case studies, media analysis, and interviews, the paper argues that Russia’s integrated strategy has deepened polarization and complicated NATO’s eastern defense. The Baltic experience offers critical lessons for countering malign influence in an era where information has become a primary domain of conflict.