This paper analyzes whether there is a higher willingness-to-pay when faced with un- certain gains or uncertain losses. In addition, we look at how the restriction on choice, established with different framings, impacts the WTP. We observe that there is no differ- ence in the WTP between gains and losses, but there is a difference in the WTP between different framings of the restriction of choice. Specifically, we see that respondents who are faced with a delegation decision have a smaller WTP than those who only face a decision of choosing between a pair of lotteries. In addition, we find that the WTP is even smaller when the default of a third-party agent choosing is imposed.