16:50 - 18:30
PS10
Room:
Room: Meeting Room 2.3
Panel Session 10
Semih Cakir - A Spatial Explanation on How Elite Polarization Shapes Opinion Formation: Conditional Effect of Party Identification
Svenja Krauss - In for a penny, in for a pound? Do perceptions of support parties shift with governing coalition partners?
Roni Lehrer - Cabinet Roles, Coalition Conflict, and Perceived Policy Clarity under Multi-party Governments
Mariken van der Velden, Maurits Meijers - Responsive or Responsible? The Reputational Cost of Political Compromise
Ida Hjermitslev - Coalition heuristics in multi-level systems
Cabinet Roles, Coalition Conflict, and Perceived Policy Clarity under Multi-party Governments
PS10-3
Presented by: Roni Lehrer
Mariyana Angelova 1Roni Lehrer 2, Nick Lin 3
1 Central European University, Austria
2 University of Mannheim, Germany
3 Academia Sinica, Taiwan
The clarity of party programs is critical in democratic representation and essential for voters’ electoral choices. However, in multiparty governments where policy responsibility is blurred, it is difficult for coalition parties to maintain their policy clarity. In this paper, we study how voters build their beliefs about the clarity of policy goals of parties in coalition governments? Drawing insights from prior work on coalition governance, we suggest that voters use cabinet roles and intra-coalition conflict as informational cues to update their perceptions of coalition parties’ policy clarity. More precisely, we hypothesize that voters tend to believe that the prime-ministerial (PM) party has clearer policy goals than junior coalition partners and that the perceived clarity of the PM party’s policy goals declines as voters perceive greater intra-coalition conflict. To test our arguments, we conducted an original survey in six Western European countries where coalition governance is the norm and asked respondents for their direct assessments of the clarity of parties’ policy goals. Our empirical analyses reveal supportive evidence consistent with our theoretical expectations. These findings, therefore, enhance the current scholarly understanding of how voters comprehend coalition governance and have central implications for future research on political representation in multiparty governments.