11:20 - 13:00
P2
Room:
Room: Terrace 2B
Panel Session 2
Daniela Donno - Competing Verdicts: Multiple Election Monitors and Post-Election Violence
Gidon Cohen - Can Professionalization of the Police Curb Election Violence? Evidence From 19th Century England and Wales
Neeraj Prasad - Violence as an Electoral Strategy: Booth-Level Evidence from West Bengal, India
Giacomo Lemoli - Ethnic media, repression, and the mobilization of national identity
Patrick Kuhn - Electoral Competitiveness and Election Violence: Long-Term, Large-N, Within-Country Evidence From England and Wales, 1832-1914
Can Professionalization of the Police Curb Election Violence? Evidence From 19th Century England and Wales
P2-3
Presented by: Gidon Cohen
Gidon CohenPatrick KuhnNick Vivyan
Durham University
Roughly 25% of all elections worldwide experience some form of violence. While existing research has made significant inroads to understanding the causes of election violence, less research has been done on how effective proposed prevention mechanisms are. Existing qualitative case studies from Kenya and Liberia suggest that security sector reform (i.e., training and professionalization of the police) is among the most effective tools in preventing election violence (Claes 2016). Using original event data on election violence and data on police professionalization, staffing, and pay from 20 parliamentary elections between 1832 and 1914, we provide the first quantitative within-country and -constituency assessment on how effective security sector reform is at curbing election violence. We find that the establishment of professionalized police forces reduced pre-election violence, especially large-scale riots and disturbances. Moreover, once a constabulary has been formed more and better-paid police forces further reduce the number of recorded incidents.