13:30 - 15:00
Panel Session 2
Room: Zoom
Chair/s:
Benjamin G. Engst, Daniel Naurin
Instrument of Power or Weapon of the Weak? Litigation and Legal Representation before the European Court of Justice
Silje Hermansen, Tommaso Pavone
PluriCourts, University of Oslo, Oslo

Studies of legal mobilization in the European Union are animated by a core puzzle: Does the EU's multi-level judicial system advance the rights of the "have nots" or reinforce the influence of the "haves"? While some stress that EU protections of individual rights have expanded over time, others underscore that lawyers specializing in litigation before the European Court of Justice (CJEU) increasingly gravitate towards corporate law firms. Leveraging semi-structured interviews and time series analysis of an original dataset of parties and lawyers in all cases referred to the CJEU from national judges, we assess whether businesses obtain better legal representation before the Court and whether this advantage has grown over time. Our results speak to whether legal mobilization before the European Court tends to vindicate individual rights or to magnify corporate power.


Reference:
Fr-P6-05
Session:
Judicial independence and strategic decision-making in courts in an era of political polarization
Presenter/s:
Silje Hermansen
Topic:
EU Politics
Presentation type:
Oral presentation
Room:
Zoom
Chair/s:
Benjamin G. Engst, Daniel Naurin
Date:
Friday, 19 June
Time:
14:30 - 14:45
Session times:
13:30 - 15:00

EPSA Virtual 2020 Sponsors

Cambridge University Press

Princeton University Press